Candidates differ on relevance of Lieutenant Governor
By Bill Rea

The declared candidates in Oak Ridges - Markham in the oct. 10 provincial election were asked a series of questions over the last week, seeking their spontaneous responses to specific issues.

Their responses are presented here in alphabetical order.

Are MPPs

appropriately paid?

Progressive Conservative Phil Bannon said he hasn't researched the issue, but stated that with the recent raises MPPs awarded themselves, "they brought themselves up to a proper level of compensation."

He added he understands there are no pensions associated with being an MPP.

He also compared MPPs' salaries to the "significant amount of money" paid to MPs and local and regional councillors in the Greater Toronto Area. "I think it's comparable."

"No," replied New Democrat Janice Hagan. "I believe they make way too much money."

She agreed they need to be paid as professionals, but the substantial hike they received "is not acceptable."

"I don't really think we need to be attracting people just with the salary," Hagan added "It should almost be like serving."

Liberal Helena Jaczek pointed out MPPs' salaries were established in a report by the Integrity Commissioner, which was approved by all three parties, setting the rate at 75 per cent of that paid to MPs.

"I think obviously, with the Integrity Commissioner's backing of it, I would say yes," she remarked, adding she doesn't think anyone gets into politics for the money.

Should the Ontario

Municipal Board

be abolished?

"I'm not one for abolishing boards and commissions just because there is a vocal group of people opposing a commission or group," Bannon commented.

He said he would prefer to see a significant review to check the benefits and impacts such bodies have on the community and government.

"I wouldn't say 'abolished' right now," Hagan said, stating she would like to see some study about what to replace the board with. "I wouldn't do something that radical right off."

"I wouldn't start getting rid of structures that have something to give at this point," she added, commenting the board might need restructuring and more of a focus when it comes to determining the needs of cities.

"It's a difficult question," Jaczek commented.

She said there have been changes in recent years, such as recruiting more people who specialize in town planning. "I haven't heard of any problems recently," she remarked.

She also commented that municipalities were distressed a couple of years ago when it seemed easy for developers to refer their plans to the board. She understood that issue has been addressed.

Jaczek also though it's important to have a body of sober second thought.

Is the office of Lieutenant

Governor still relevant?

"Yes," said Bannon. "I believe the people of Ontario have a lot of respect for the government."

He said there are individuals representing certain communities well, and who have the opportunity to be leading figures. He cited the example of new Lt.-Gov. David Onley, calling him a "tremendous personality," adding he's well respected and that his office should be maintained.

He added he's a council representative on the accessibility committee in Whitchurch - Stouffville, and they are working to make it the first barrier-free town in Ontario. A man like Onley, in his position, could be a big support in that regard.

"Honestly, no," Hagan declared. "I don't think we can afford figurehead positions in government."

"Oh I think so," Jaczek said.

"Obviously, it's a ceremonial role," she added, pointing out former Lt.-Gov. James Bartleman did a lot to promote literacy in First Nations communities and she's expecting more of the same from Onley.

"I think it's much more than being there for ceremonial occasions," she added.